Graubünden prepares action plan to combat organised crime

Graubünden is preparing a dedicated action plan and an external expert report on organised crime. The cantonal government announced the move on September 14, 2026, responding to a parliamentary question from Centre Party lawmaker Sandra Maissen. Her intervention followed arrests linked to an international drug operation and concerns about how criminal networks can establish themselves in southern Graubünden.

The report will examine measures for public authorities, businesses and wider society. It will also support implementation of Switzerland’s national strategy against organised crime, with Graubünden saying it intends to play an active role.

The government’s response divides the parliamentary demands into two groups. Two of four requests have already been met, according to the canton. The remaining proposals will be considered through the new action plan, allowing officials to assess how existing controls work and where new instruments may be needed.

The announcement puts a small Alpine canton into a broader Swiss debate about money laundering, residence permits and cooperation between cantonal and federal authorities. Graubünden’s geography, its border connections and the movement of people and capital through the Mesolcina valley have made local oversight a matter of national interest. The action plan is intended to turn that concern into a coordinated programme of measures.

The arrests of seven people in a late February Europol operation brought residence permit checks into sharp focus. Four of those arrested were living in Roveredo, a municipality in the Mesolcina valley, and held valid B residence permits in Graubünden.

The suspects were described in the parliamentary motion as alleged members of the Camorra, the ’Ndrangheta and a Balkan criminal clan. One person had previously been refused a residence permit in neighbouring Ticino. According to the motion, Graubünden authorities did not know about that decision for months.

The case raised questions about how information moves between Swiss cantons and how authorities identify risks when people apply to live in the country. The government said a binding procedure already exists for checking immigration law procedures in other cantons. It also said current information and monitoring systems have proved effective.

Those assurances do not close the political debate. The parliamentary motion argued that a decision in one canton should be visible to another when relevant to public security. The forthcoming expert report is expected to examine how authorities can strengthen coordination while operating within federal rules on residence and data handling. Its findings will help define whether existing procedures require adjustment or closer enforcement.

Graubünden has already expanded checks for some residence permit applications. The canton says a full security check is in place when issuing permits, and that monitoring options allowed by law are used systematically.

For nationals from outside the EU and EFTA, a criminal record extract is normally required. For EU and EFTA citizens, authorities generally request the document when there are grounds for suspicion. Graubünden has introduced a temporary additional measure in the Moesa region: every new permit application from an EU or EFTA citizen must include a criminal record extract.

Moesa is one of 11 administrative districts in Graubünden and includes Roveredo. The regional requirement reflects the particular scrutiny placed on the valley after the international arrests. It also illustrates the practical challenge facing the canton: controls must respond to local risks while remaining consistent with Swiss immigration law and the country’s agreements with the European Union.

The government has asked parliament to treat the residence permit requests that have already been implemented as settled. Whether the Moesa measure remains temporary, expands to other parts of the canton or is replaced by another system will depend on the action plan and the expert assessment. The available information does not indicate a broader permanent rule at this stage.