AI
Written with AI assistanceâ˘January 19, 2026â˘
AI
Generated IllustrationDespite ongoing tensions over Greenland, a separate agreement to lower US tariffs on Swiss imports has been finalized by the Swiss government. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, arriving in Davos, hailed relations as being 'back on track,' signaling a positive resolution to a recent period of trade friction.
"After a turbulent period in recent months, relations between Switzerland and the United States are back on a very good track."
"Despite the reduction from 39% to 15%, the effects of US duties on the Swiss economy remain considerable."
After months of diplomatic frost, the thaw has officially begun in the Swiss Alps. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, touching down in Davos for the World Economic Forum on Monday, wasted no time in declaring that US-Swiss relations are "back on a very good track." This bold assertion marks a critical pivot from the "turbulent period" that has plagued the trans-Atlantic partnership, largely stemming from recent geopolitical friction.
The atmosphere in Davos is charged with urgency. Swiss President Guy Parmelin is seizing this window of opportunity, expressing a clear willingness to finalize the accord right here, right now, amidst the global elite. The message from the US delegation is unambiguous: the era of bitter discussions is ending, provided Switzerland plays its cards right. Bessentâs arrival signals that Washington is ready to do business, but the pressure remains palpable as both nations attempt to turn a provisional truce into a permanent economic peace.
The numbers tell a story of dramatic relief coupled with a looming ultimatum. Tariffs on Swiss exports to the US have plummeted from a suffocating 39% to a more manageable 15%âa vital lifeline for Swiss industry. However, this reprieve is currently hanging by a thread. Washington has issued a stark deadline: a legally binding deal must be signed by March 31, 2026.
Failure is not an option. The White House has explicitly threatened to "review and reconsider" the applied rates if the clock runs out without a signature. This creates a high-stakes race against time for Bern. The current arrangement, based on a declaration of intent from November, is merely a stopgap. To lock in these gains and prevent a return to punitive trade barriers, Swiss negotiators must convert the current goodwill into hard ink on paper within the next ten weeks. The 15% rate, while an improvement, still represents a significant hurdle compared to free trade, but securing it permanently is the immediate tactical priority.
Bern is not writing a blank check to Washington. In a display of sovereign assertiveness, the Swiss Parliament has drawn clear red lines in the sand. The Federal Councilâs negotiating mandate was only approved after rigorous consultation, with the National Councilâs committee flatly rejecting attempts to attach "woke" strings to the deal. Proposals to restrict meat imports or enforce vehicle approval changes based on environmental sustainability were thrown out, signaling that Switzerland will not compromise its domestic autonomy for trade access.
Furthermore, the committee demanded absolute clarity on investment figures. They emphasized that a mooted CHF 200 billion investment in the United States must be strictly private capital, with zero state backing. This legislative pushback ensures that while the government seeks a deal, it is not authorized to stray beyond the scope of the mandate. If negotiators attempt to add new themes, they will be forced back to the table with the cantonsâa procedural brake designed to keep the government's hand steady but accountable.
While politicians shake hands in Davos, the Swiss public remains deeply unconvinced. A staggering 63% of respondents in a recent RTS poll condemned the prospective agreement as a "bad deal" for Switzerland. This disconnect between the elite's optimism and the public's pessimism highlights a critical fracture. The Swiss people appear wary of US pressure tactics and skeptical of the benefits of a deal that still leaves a 15% tariff wall in place.
Economically, the skepticism is grounded in hard reality. As noted by EY, despite the reduction, US duties remain a "burden" for the Swiss economy. The drop from 39% is a salvage operation, not a triumph of free trade. Swiss exporters are still grappling with significant costs compared to competitors with full free trade agreements. As the government rushes to finalize terms, they confront a domestic audience that sees this not as a victory, but as a concession to a superpower's strong-arming.