AI
Written with AI assistance•January 28, 2026•
AI
Generated IllustrationUnited Nations human rights experts have expressed alarm over ETH Zurich's decision to pursue criminal prosecution against students for trespassing during a protest, raising concerns over the criminalization of fundamental freedoms in Switzerland.
"Criminalisation of fundamental freedoms."
"Potential military application of its work could not be ruled out."
International scrutiny has descended upon Switzerland's most prestigious academic institution with unprecedented force. Ten United Nations human rights experts have issued a blistering condemnation of ETH Zurich, expressing profound alarm over the university's aggressive pursuit of criminal charges against student protesters. The experts, mandated by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, explicitly denounced what they term the "criminalisation of fundamental freedoms" in the heart of Europe.
This intervention marks a significant escalation in the fallout from the campus unrest. While Swiss institutions often pride themselves on neutrality and dialogue, the decision to drag students through the criminal justice system has drawn a sharp rebuke from the highest levels of international human rights monitoring. The experts' statement challenges the narrative that the university was merely enforcing property rights, reframing the legal battle as a direct assault on the right to peaceful assembly and free expression. As the global spotlight turns to Zurich, the university's hardline stance risks damaging its reputation as a beacon of open inquiry.
Nearly 70 students ignited a firestorm in May 2024, occupying the halls of ETH Zurich in a defiant sit-in that shattered the campus's usual calm. Their demands were unequivocal: the immediate withdrawal of the university from any research collaborations feeding Israel’s military-industrial apparatus. This was not a polite request; it was a direct confrontation with the ethical foundations of publicly funded science.
The protest, part of a wider wave that swept through Lausanne and Geneva, forced the administration to confront its geopolitical footprint. However, rather than engaging in the dialogue demanded by the activists, ETH Zurich responded with law enforcement. The university lodged formal complaints for trespassing, effectively transforming a political debate into a police matter. This heavy-handed response set the stage for the current legal quagmire, signaling to the student body that disruption of the status quo would be met with swift institutional retribution.
The judicial aftermath of the protest has been staggering. Authorities issued a total of 38 penal orders against the participants, a mass criminalization of student activism rarely seen in recent Swiss history. Refusing to be silenced, 17 of those targeted chose to fight back, launching appeals that have kept the controversy alive in the courts well into 2026.
The legal battles are now yielding a fractured and contentious landscape. Recent verdicts have upheld trespassing convictions for five students, reinforcing the university's property rights over the right to protest. Conversely, two activists secured acquittals, though merely on procedural grounds rather than a vindication of their cause. With decisions for ten remaining students still pending, the Swiss judicial system remains locked in a tense grapple with the limits of civil disobedience. These trials serve as a chilling warning to future dissenters: the price of protest in Zurich is a criminal record.
At the core of the protest lies a critical void in oversight. Until October 2025, ETH Zurich's own website admitted a disturbing reality: no end-use controls existed for knowledge exchanged through fundamental research, and potential military applications of its work could not be ruled out. This admission vindicates the protesters' central fear—that Swiss science is inadvertently fueling foreign conflicts.
While Switzerland introduced new dual-use export control regulations in May 2025, a glaring loophole remains. These regulations do not apply to fundamental research, leaving a massive blind spot in national security and ethical governance. Responsibility is largely delegated to individual researchers, a system lacking robust institutional oversight. As the UN experts amplify these concerns, ETH Zurich faces mounting pressure to prove that its laboratories are not becoming silent partners in global warfare.