Annual Security 2025 study reveals 81% of Swiss citizens favor stronger Western security ties, marking shift in traditional neutrality stance amid international uncertainties.

"Neutrality continues to lose approval, something that was already hinted at in last year’s study."
"In times of increasing insecurity and flare-up of conflicts, Switzerland is seeking closer ties with the West."
A staggering 81% of Swiss citizens now view the global political situation as critically uncertain, confirming that the era of comfortable isolation is effectively over. The latest "Security 2025" study, conducted by the heavyweights at ETH Zurich, paints a picture of a nation grappling with a harsh reality check. While the Swiss have historically viewed their alpine borders as impenetrable shields, public sentiment has shifted dramatically. Optimism regarding Switzerland’s future has plummeted by 10 percentage points to just 69%—a sharp, alarming drop that signals a crisis of confidence in the status quo.
This isn't just a fleeting mood swing; it is a structural change in the national psyche. The general feeling of security has eroded by six points, landing at 86%. While this number appears high by international standards, for the Swiss—who view safety as a primary national good—this decline is significant. The data reveals a population that is increasingly pessimistic, alert, and acutely aware that the storms raging beyond their borders can no longer be ignored. The Swiss are waking up to a world where neutrality offers no guarantee of immunity.
In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, a majority of 53% of the population now explicitly favors a rapprochement with NATO. This is not merely a statistical blip; it is a seismic shift in Swiss foreign policy orientation. As conflicts flare up across the globe, the Swiss are pragmatically looking West for protection. Even more striking is the hardening of resolve regarding full membership: 32% of respondents can now imagine full NATO accession, an increase of two percentage points from the previous year.
This pivot comes at the expense of traditional "soft power" strategies. The study highlights a growing disillusionment with conflict mediation and development aid, which are losing public approval. The message from the electorate is clear: in a world of hard power, diplomatic niceties are no longer seen as sufficient armor. The Swiss public is signaling a desire for concrete security guarantees over abstract neutrality, prioritizing survival and alliance over the solitary path of the past.
The Swiss wallet is opening for defense at a rate unseen since the Cold War. Support for increased military spending has surged to its highest level since 1986, with 24% of citizens demanding additional funds for the armed forces. This is a dramatic departure from decades of fiscal conservatism regarding the military. An overwhelming 80% of those surveyed now consider the army "absolutely" or "rather necessary," cementing the military's role as a non-negotiable pillar of state sovereignty.
This financial willingness is backed by a staunch defense of the militia system itself. Despite the changing nature of warfare, 60% continue to back the traditional citizen-soldier model. The data suggests that the Swiss are not looking to outsource their defense entirely but are willing to pay a premium to ensure their own forces are capable, modern, and ready. The era of the "peace dividend" is dead; the Swiss are rearming, mentally and financially, for a more dangerous decade.
The sacred cow of Swiss identity—neutrality—is looking leaner than ever. While approval remains high at 87%, this figure is a deceptive comfort; it sits a full 10 percentage points lower than before the invasion of Ukraine. The definition of what it means to be "neutral" is currently being torn apart in the court of public opinion. A significant 40% of citizens now view close economic and political ties as an obstacle to consistent neutrality, revealing a deep internal conflict between economic reality and political ideology.
Respondents are deeply divided on whether Switzerland should take a clear political stance in global conflicts. The consensus is fracturing. The majority still favors military neutrality, but the political and economic dimensions are increasingly contested. As the Swiss gravitate toward NATO and Western security structures, the concept of "integral neutrality" is being hollowed out, replaced by a more flexible, albeit controversial, interpretation that prioritizes security over strict non-alignment.
Switzerland is on the brink of a radical modernization of its service model. A robust 67% of the population now supports a "service for all" model, mandating compulsory service for both men and women. This proposed system offers a choice between military, civil, or social service, reflecting a modern understanding of national contribution. The desire for the traditional male-only conscription is declining significantly, while a growing minority of 47% explicitly favors extending military conscription to women.
This shift represents a fundamental redefinition of civic duty in Switzerland. It moves beyond the gendered history of the militia system toward a universal obligation to the state. As the feeling of security drops, the willingness to contribute personally to the nation's resilience is rising. The Swiss are signaling that in a fragmented world, the responsibility for national safety and social cohesion must be borne by everyone, regardless of gender.