Following a US court ruling against certain tariffs, Swiss companies are moving to reclaim millions in overpaid duties. However, with the US administration exploring new legal avenues, Swiss economic officials warn of continued uncertainty and the likelihood of living with tariffs.

"Our subsidiary in the US will apply for a retroactive refund of the surcharges paid."
"I suspect weâll have to live with the US tariffs."
Millions of francs are on the line as Swiss corporate titans launch an aggressive bid to reclaim overpaid US customs duties. Following a bombshell US Supreme Court ruling that declared certain reciprocal tariffs illegal, the floodgates have opened. Swatch Group led the charge on Monday, declaring unequivocally that its US subsidiary will apply for a "retroactive refund" of surcharges. They are not alone in this high-stakes financial offensive.
Heavyweights across the Swiss industrial spectrum are mobilizing. Breitling CEO Georges Kern has already signaled that "significant amounts" are at stake for the luxury watchmaker. From the chocolatiers at LÀderach to the tech innovators at Logitech and ski manufacturers at Stöckli, the message is unified: we want our money back. This is not merely a bureaucratic adjustment; it is a scramble to recover capital in a market that remains Switzerland's most critical export destination. While Rolex remains tight-lipped, the sheer volume of companies stepping forward signals a massive, coordinated effort to capitalize on the US administration's legal stumble before the window of opportunity slams shut.
Despite the optimism in boardrooms, the path to restitution is paved with bureaucratic landmines. The Supreme Court may have struck down the legal basis for the tariffs, but it did not hand Swiss companies a blank check. Noé Blancpain of the industry association Swissmem warns that "a lot is still open," creating a climate of high anxiety. The devil is in the details: the Supreme Court has left the messy mechanics of repayment to lower courts, guaranteeing a prolonged legal slog.
Crucially, the refund process is technically restricted to the "importer of record" in the USâoften a subsidiary or a third-party distributorârather than the Swiss parent company directly. This adds a layer of complexity that could delay payouts for months, if not years. Furthermore, many Swiss manufacturers had already absorbed these costs or split them with clients, meaning any recovered funds will spark difficult negotiations over who actually gets to keep the cash. The victory in court is clear, but the logistical reality is a murky, tangled web that threatens to dilute the financial win.
Just as Swiss companies celebrated the court ruling, the US administration struck back with volatile unpredictability. In a move described by analysts as a "tax yo-yo," President Donald Trump immediately pivoted to a new legal weaponâSection 122âslapping a fresh global tariff of up to 15% on imports for the next 150 days. This rapid-fire retaliation has plunged the business landscape back into chaos, blurring the lines between victory and defeat.
Confusion now reigns supreme. Experts are divided on whether this new 15% levy replaces the voided tariffs or stacks on top of existing duties, creating a nightmare scenario for exporters. "Swiss companies don't know what rate they will be charged," admits John Plassard of Cité Gestion. The instability is palpable. While the Supreme Court's decision was a triumph for the rule of law, the executive branch's aggressive counter-maneuver proves that the trade war is far from over. Swiss exporters are now trapped in limbo, forced to navigate a shifting landscape where the rules of engagement change overnight.
The era of predictable free trade is dead, and Bern is waking up to a harsh new reality. Helene Budliger Artieda, head of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), delivered a sobering message this weekend: "I suspect weâll have to live with the US tariffs." This admission marks a critical shift in mindset. The US administration has a vast arsenal of legal toolsâfrom Section 232 on national security to Section 301 on unfair tradeâensuring that protectionism will remain a permanent fixture of transatlantic relations.
While a Swiss parliamentary delegation jets off to Washington this week in a desperate bid for clarity, the writing is on the wall. With over $200 billion in planned Swiss investment in the US at risk, the stakes could not be higher. However, the hope that a simple legal ruling or a change in administration would return the world to the status quo has evaporated. Swiss industry must now adapt to a "managed trade" environment where tariffs are not an anomaly, but the baseline cost of doing business with the world's largest economy.