Kühne+Nagel
Kühne+Nagel to investigate its Nazi-era history
Swiss logistics company Kühne+Nagel says it plans to investigate and disclose its activities during the Nazi era, including its links to the expropriation of Jewish property. The review follows renewed scrutiny of the company’s historical role and the fate of its Jewish co-owner Adolf Maass.

Kühne+Nagel will examine one of the most difficult chapters in its corporate history. The Schwyz based logistics group said on September 24 that it intends to investigate and disclose its activities during the Second World War, including reported links to the expropriation of Jewish property. The decision follows renewed scrutiny of the company’s German origins, the fate of Jewish co-owner Adolf Maass and the role played by the Kühne family during the Nazi period.
Chair Jörg Wolle confirmed the planned review in an interview with the German language magazine Bilanz. The company’s board will consider the project in the near future, a spokesperson told the AWP business news agency. Kühne+Nagel has not yet announced who will conduct the research, how broad its mandate will be or when work will begin.
The announcement places the company among Swiss firms confronting business ties to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. Its Swiss headquarters in Schindellegi are far removed from the company’s origins in Bremen, but the historical record concerns the group’s wider corporate identity. Any investigation will need to establish what the company knew, which decisions it took and how property seized from Jewish victims moved through its logistics network.
Trace Adolf Maass’s Lost 45%
Adolf Maass held 45% of Kühne+Nagel before the Nazi regime forced him out in 1933. Maass was a Jewish partner in the Bremen company when Adolf Hitler’s government began dismantling Jewish economic and civil rights. The available account says he was compelled to relinquish his stake, severing his position in the business during the regime’s first year.
Maass was later deported to Auschwitz. He never returned. His story gives the planned investigation a clearly defined human and corporate focus: the treatment of a co-owner whose shareholding represented nearly half of the company before Nazi persecution stripped him of it.
The company’s review is also expected to examine whether Kühne+Nagel benefited from the removal of Jewish owners and businesses. A full account would need to trace the ownership transfer, identify the people involved and establish whether Maass or his heirs received compensation. The source material does not state what happened to his stake after he was forced to surrender it.
For Swiss observers, the case raises questions about how companies headquartered in Switzerland account for conduct carried out through predecessor firms abroad. Kühne+Nagel’s current legal structure cannot by itself settle responsibility for decisions made in 1930s Germany. That requires records, independent analysis and a public account of the evidence.
Trace the Confiscated Property
The investigation is expected to follow goods taken from Jews who fled or were deported. During the Nazi period, Kühne+Nagel is reported to have transported movable property confiscated from Jewish victims. Such shipments could include household possessions and other personal belongings removed during forced emigration, deportation or the seizure of Jewish businesses.
The available report attributes these activities to the company under the direction of Alfred Kühne, the father of Klaus-Michael Kühne. It does not provide a complete inventory of shipments, the locations involved or the financial value of the goods. Those details will be central to any credible historical account.
Logistics companies occupied a practical position in the Nazi system of dispossession. They stored, moved and delivered property after state authorities had stripped people of their homes and businesses. Examining transport records could help show how persecution became an organised administrative and commercial process.
Researchers will likely need to consult company archives, German state records, property claims and documentation from Jewish families. The review should also distinguish between direct orders, commercial services and any forms of cooperation with Nazi authorities. Establishing those distinctions will matter for historians and for people seeking information about relatives whose possessions disappeared during the Holocaust.