Crans-Montana
Crans-Montana victims face anniversary memorial and settlement process
As the first anniversary of the Crans-Montana fire approaches, Valais is planning a memorial ceremony while Parliament advances a settlement mechanism worth up to CHF20 million.

41 people died and 115 were injured, and Valais is preparing to mark the first anniversary of the Crans-Montana fire with a public ceremony and a still unfinished settlement process.
The memorial will take place on January 1, 2027, at 10:00 a.m. in the sports hall of the Crans-Montana Conference Centre. The Canton of Valais is organising the event with the municipality of Crans-Montana, part of the Haut-Plateau region. Relatives of those who died, injured survivors and their families will be invited. Rescue workers and medical personnel will also be represented.
The timing places public remembrance alongside a major political decision. On the same day that Valais prepares to gather families and officials, Parliament is advancing a mechanism that could help settle claims without years of civil litigation. The National Council approved the relevant clause by 106 votes to 87, with four abstentions. The measure had already passed the Council of States, but it must return there to resolve one remaining disagreement.
For families, the two processes address different needs. The ceremony offers recognition and a shared place of remembrance. The settlement plan is intended to provide a route towards financial resolution.
The Ceremony Will Honour Victims and Those Who Helped
The January 1 ceremony will bring victims’ families, survivors and rescuers into the same room. Valais says the gathering will publicly honour those affected and preserve the tragedy in the region’s collective memory.
Christophe Darbellay, President of the Valais cantonal government, said the purpose was to show that victims and their loved ones had not been forgotten. He acknowledged that public recognition cannot restore lives or undo the consequences for those who survived. The event will therefore carry both a civic and personal function, with relatives and injured people at its centre.
Federal, cantonal, municipal and foreign officials are expected to attend. The canton also plans to use the occasion to thank people who responded to the fire and those who have provided continuing care. That emphasis reflects the long aftermath of the disaster, which includes medical treatment and rehabilitation as well as bereavement.
The ceremony is the first stage of a wider remembrance process. An independent civil society organisation is leading work on a permanent memorial, although the sources do not specify its design, location or completion date. Darbellay described memory as a shared public responsibility. For families, the form of that memorial will matter because it will shape how the tragedy is recalled after the anniversary events have ended.
Parliament Advances a CHF20 Million Settlement Route
Up to CHF20 million could support settlements for people affected by the fire. The National Council approved a clause allowing the Swiss government to make a supplementary contribution to agreements reached through round-table discussions.
Those discussions are designed to bring together victims, relatives, insurance companies, other potentially liable parties and public authorities. The stated goal is an out-of-court resolution that can avoid lengthy civil proceedings. The federal money would therefore sit within negotiated settlements rather than operate as an automatic payment to every victim.
That distinction matters. The available sources do not set out a tariff, eligibility formula or timetable for individual payments. They also do not specify how the maximum contribution would be divided among bereaved families, injured survivors and others affected by the fire. The mechanism’s practical value will depend on the negotiations and on the final wording of the federal legislation.
Parliament’s vote shows that the proposal remains politically contested. The National Council approved it by 106 votes to 87, with four abstentions. The bill now returns to the Council of States to settle one point of disagreement. Until that step is completed, the framework is not final. Families therefore face a settlement process that has a clear financial ceiling but unresolved operating details.