Internal tensions persist at Federal Intelligence Service despite restructuring efforts, with staff association declaring modernization attempts unsuccessful.

"The restructuring [of FIS] must be considered a failure. We are now trying to clear the rubble and minimise the damage."
"Some superiors are trying to stifle criticism. This is quite problematic and is causing some consternation among staff."
The ambitious modernization of the Swiss Federal Intelligence Service (FIS) has not just stalledâit has crashed. In a scathing assessment that shatters the veneer of bureaucratic order, the Swiss Confederationâs Staff Association (APC) has declared the restructuring efforts a definitive failure. Since 2024, the service has attempted to overhaul its units and work processes, but instead of streamlining security, the reforms have buried the agency under administrative chaos.
"We are now trying to clear the rubble and minimise the damage," declares JĂŠrĂ´me Hayoz, secretary-general of the APC. This is not merely a complaint; it is an indictment of a system in disarray. Despite management's promises to support staff, the reality on the ground is grim. The workforce, already stretched thin by the demanding nature of national security, is now grappling with a failed organizational experiment that has yielded "limited success" at best. The gap between the administration's "fine declarations" and the operational reality has never been wider, leaving the nation's intelligence apparatus in a critical state of vulnerability.
The turmoil at the FIS is quantified by undeniable, damning data. An internal survey conducted in Autumn 2024 delivered what insiders describe as "catastrophic results" for the agency's leadership. The fallout was immediate and severe. By February 2025, FIS Director Christian Dussey announced his resignation, a move that signals a profound crisis at the top of Swiss intelligence.
While Dussey promised new measures to quell the rising tide of anger before his exit, the APC asserts that the situation has barely shifted. "The current situation has not improved much since the publication of the disastrous results," Hayoz states bluntly. The timeline reveals a reactive, rather than proactive, leadership style: a disastrous survey in late 2024 followed by a high-profile resignation in early 2025. This leadership vacuum forces senior defense ministry official Marc Siegenthaler to step in and assist management through the end of the year, a desperate attempt to stabilize a ship that is taking on water fast.
Beyond the structural failures lies a more insidious threat: a pervasive culture of fear. The APC has exposed a toxic internal environment where communication has broken down and dissent is actively suppressed. In an organization where information is currency, the internal flow of dialogue is being choked off by superiors desperate to maintain control.
"Some superiors are trying to stifle criticism," warns Hayoz, highlighting a dangerous disconnect between the rank and file and the brass. This suppression is causing "consternation among staff," creating a workforce that is not only overworked but also afraid to speak up. When intelligence officers fear their own management more than external threats, the integrity of the entire service is compromised. The union's allegations paint a picture of an agency at war with itself, where valid concerns about the failed reforms are met with silence rather than solutions.
The crisis is now measured in empty desks. The FIS is hemorrhaging talent at an alarming rate, with the head of human resources departing barely a year and a half after taking office. This high-level exit is symptomatic of a broader trend of staff fluctuation that surpasses other federal departments. Yet, in the face of this exodus, the FIS public relations machine remains in varying states of denial.
A spokesperson for the service dismisses the allegations of a "climate of fear" and insists the restructuring is continuing "in a sustained manner." They argue that the turnover rate, while higher than the Confederation average, is "completely comparable to the private sector undergoing change." This attempt to normalize the departure of key personnel clashes violently with the union's narrative of a workforce in distress. As the agency tries to spin the narrative, the reality remains: the FIS is losing the very people it needs to protect Switzerland, and the "rubble" of reform continues to pile up.